Home > People
Blog

 GURU 

broadcast
41
Manhattan,
In NYC Since: 1982

Life and style in the city 

September 17, 2005

Weekend Wall Street Journal



Although we prefer to cover the blogosphere and electronic empires of the almighty Web, two remarkable old-media stories are playing out this weekend, both of which were overhyped all summer long:
First, the Wall Street Journal launches its Weekend edition today, as usual available on the web only to its subscribers or via another website's clever method of reprinting or redirecting to it. Will it compete with the weekend edition of the Financial Times? Does it enhance the subscription model, considering what a large percentage of its subscribtions are delivered to offices which (one only hopes) are closed on weekends? Does it deliver interesting content? A cursory glance of 40 headlines such as "Looking Upscale, Wal-Mart Begins a Makeover," "Hong Kong Disney: An Insider's Guide," and "Chefs Gone Wild"—along with the ultra-right editorial page free-throws for Johns Roberts and Bolton—makes this editor conclude that his fascinating Saturday project of painting the living room will absolutely be less boring than reading today's WSJ cover to cover. (Although perhaps it will be rendered into a useful dropcloth.)
Second, on Monday the New York Times launches TimesSelect, a quasi-Journal subscription service in which e-readers will now be forced to pay to read Op-Ed, sports and some other content. The hook? You also get access to 100 articles from the archive per month, a rather impressive feature. Considering the subscription costs $49.95 a year or "will be free for home delivery subscribers," the jury will be out for a while. However, the Web's most feared pundit, Matt Drudge, already announced he will 'pull' Times content if it does not remain free of charge. One assumes Sulzberger Jr. began to quake visibly when he learned of this development.
But seriously, these two print-media developments do redefine the weekend much as the blogosphere before them redefined the weekend. Surely it did not go unnoticed in these editorial departments that the blogosphere—especially in the wake of Katrina—generates massive output on the weekends, something that print media even with its "continuously updated articles" (i.e. two or three words get modified every four hours) struggle mightily to compete with on their websites. (The Times utilizes a few clever tricks, which fool no one.)
Whereas Arianna Huffington was mocked when she announced plans to launch her blog, it would be difficult to deny—except perhaps for Bill Kristol, whose appearance yesterday on the Brian Lehrer show underscores that he stills lives in a parallel universe of denial—that she has attracted some of the best-known and most respected writers in America to her website. For this editor, who honed his speed-reading skills in the PR department of a multinational corporation, the methodology of reading 300 articles an hour has taken a quantum leap thanks to RSS. Just a few years ago, speed reading a thick stack of newspapers led to both filthy hands and paper cuts (as well as a full recycling basket every morning), RSS now enables my pitiful mind to scan over a thousand articles from 30 sources with relative ease. My only wish is that father Murdoch would add RSS to his New York Post, but one can't expect the cheese danish to rise to the level of the chocolate croissants.
Update: the Weekend Edition of the WSJ was indeed useful for covering the living room floor.


Tags:   None


© All rights reserved.

Posted on 9/17/2005 ( Permanent Link )
 Send to Friend


September 16, 2005

Dear Restaurateur,



Congratulations on your opening. You've worked very hard securing financing, finding the best chef, the best fixtures, china, flowers and support staff. What have you forgotten? Too frequently in this season of restaurant openings, owners have overlooked a critical component for dining in the new millennium: the website. Since 100% of your customers use e-mail and probably spend at least a few minutes (hours?) each day at the office surfing the Web, you've got a captive audience that you might have totally overlooked. Your customers can see the dining room, have a look at the bar, read the menu, and even -gasp- reserve a table online. (Never reserved a table online? Try it right here at NYC.com!) Sadly, too many mid-level New York restaurants still don't even grasp the significance of this. Even though fighting for that hard-to-reserve corner table is the biggest blood sport on this island, the overworked reservationist at any top Manhattan restaurant could probably use a little down time. So why not spend the money on a decent Website? We realize the reasons are many. But consider this: as your overworked public-relations team makes the pitch to media organizations and plans your opening night, rather than keeping the cognoscenti guessing, you might just announce your intentions (and post some photos) on the Web. And by the way: after you open, it's probably a good idea to actually have something on your Website. Don't just reserve the URL and announce: "This is the future home of _____."
At this time we would like to introduce our new chief restaurant critic, who goes by the pseudonym of Adanna and has numerous years of experience in the restaurant industry as well as the requisite French-chef brother-in-law. Please allow us to state for the record: while we greatly enjoy opening-night events, we do dine anonymously and we always pay for our own meals. We prefer to be treated just like everyone else who walks through your door, and since we are, our reviews are perfectly frank and forthright about what a well-dressed and polite diner should expect. After a few dining experiences, we then usually send a photographer and make further inquiries about the menu and ingredient sourcing before writing our review. What's more, we don't think we are any better or smarter than our users, so our users get equal billing: we encourage all our registered users to write reviews, and they are available for all to comment on. While we won't tolerate unfair personal attacks, we do expect our users will also be perfectly frank about their dining experiences.
And because we also have a sense of humor here at NYC.com and don't take absolutely everything seriously, from time to time we like to provide some comic relief. So it is with pleasure we conclude with Notes From an Opening by Adanna, a few things she actually witnessed this past week:

1. The décor, like many of the garments present, had some great elements, but the look has yet to be completed.
2. It was like the controlled chaos around the arc de triomphe at rush hour, but without the control.
3. Spandex should be worn sparingly, and never over undergarments that are size too small.
4. Women over the age of 18 should not buy evening wear at Strawberry.
5. One day, I would like to find the strange continent from whence come the females of big blonde hair, orange skin, bubble-wrap lips and oddly-slanting eyes. 
6. The mix of Paco Rabanne and Drakkar Noir in the air took me back to the 80’s, and I did not want to go. 
7. There was a post-colonial feel that reminded me of old Toronto. 
8. The fact the there is a foie gras terrine AND chicken wings with blue cheese on the same menu says it all – that and the pink feather boa gazing upon the Clockwork Orange light fixtures. 


Tags:   None


© All rights reserved.

Posted on 9/16/2005 ( Permanent Link )
 Send to Friend


September 11, 2005

rambling 9/11 walkabout


At 8:46 am today on this gorgeous Sunday morning, September 11, I walked south along the banks of the Hudson River, about 1.5 miles away from the World Financial Center. It seems difficult to be optimistic about the future of Ground Zero, given how very Byzantine the rebuilding process has become. And the lack of clear leadership and clear goals for Ground Zero is mirrored on a national level, which is obvious in the stultifying disarray we've seen after Hurricane Katrina.
In yesterday's Times, Nicolai Ourousoff brilliantly summarized where we stand four years later. We have a design for a Freedom Tower that is more of a fortress than a symbol of freedom rising. The memorial plans are in a state of chaos; and the proposed Freedom Center has gone from burlesque to travesty. When your governor insists that freedom of expression will be strictly controlled at the Freedom Center, you know that what Thucydides warned about over 2400 years ago in The Peloponnesian War regarding the battle over Corcyra has come true: "To fit in with the change of events, words, too, had to change their usual meanings." And mirrored on a national level, we have a Pentagon-inspired Freedom Walk, for which the unregistered will be subject to arrest along the tightly controlled march route. Freedom, it seems, isn't free.
But there is no sudden crisis of leadership; it has been with us all along. The EPA failed us in the days and weeks after September 11, failing to adequately monitor the air or the workers at Ground Zero. Too few citizens were registered by the federal government to be monitored over the coming decades, and we really have no idea if the cleanups of apartments in lower Manhattan were even effective or just too late in removing particulate matter. In short, government improvised, and failed miserably, just as it did lately after Hurricane Katrina. If New Yorkers have re-learned any useful lesson four years after 9/11, it is to be prepared: because no government, whether local, state or federal, will be there for the masses of the poorest and the neediest in their darkest hour. While New York City now has outlined an evacuation plan in case of a Category IV hurricane, probably PATH, Amtrak and Metro-North would be the most effective means of getting out of the city, assuming the tunnels weren't already flooded or that terrorists hadn't laid waste to our-still woefully underprotected mass transit systems. (If you want to call my bluff, go visit any station or tunnel of your choice on an early Sunday morning and take pictures of whatever you like. No one will be awake to question you.) And heaven help us all if there is an ABC (atomic, biological, chemical) attack here, because the Health Department can barely even keep outbreaks of sexually-transmitted diseases under control in the best of times. (Crystal meth, anyone?) And as for the strategically-located shelters throughout our city where we could evacuate to in case of mass disaster, New Orleans has taught us it would be better to swim the Hudson and risk drowning than repair to a public shelter.
Our still-open wounds are failing to heal, and frankly our only consolation has been the massive amount of building taking place elsewhere in the city. Ourousoff is right that Santiago Calatrava's train station "may end up as one of the most glorious public spaces to rise in New York since the construction of Grand Central Terminal." Curiously, the other most interesting buildings of note are also largely glass confections: I am now walking past Richard Meier's three glass towers between Perry and Charles Streets, and I am also thinking of Calatrava's proposed funky glass condominium at South Street and the Austrian cultural forum. Of course, a Category IV hurricane would likely wreck all the above buildings except the Austrian cultural forum, fortuitously located in Midtown well away from the rivers. So perhaps these are the metaphors for our collective psyche: fragile and easily breakable. And our fractured superego as evidenced by Ground Zero and our inability to come to reasonable collective decisions of its future? Perhaps we should ask Richard Serra to place one of his beautiful torqued ellipses at the site; these mammoth rusting hulks of steel so symbolize our former greatness of the 20th century, now eclipsed by the new age of Homeland Security.
We waited nearly four years to see the transcripts of EMT, police and fire responders on 9/11, and having read them in their entirety, I still walk away with a sense of deep dissatisfaction. Our first responders did not have adequate communications gear then, and I question if they even do now. Where are all the billions for homeland security really going? Nothing written above in rage is meant to denigrate or dishonor the victims of 9/11. In fact, a truly patriotic response in loving memory of the dead is to question the fools who have risen to power in these troubling times. For they misdirected hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and dispatched their cronies from Halliburton and Blackwater Consulting et al—whether to Afghanistan, Iraq, or New Orleans—as this great nation begins to bankrupt itself in the name of security. I won't mention names, but some have grown vastly wealthy from the new homeland security state, having quickly traded in their credentials for mega-consulting stints. Whether yesterday's closure of Baghdad airport by private contractors who complain they have not been paid, or the continuous chaos at Newark Liberty airport (your only liberty there is to bring your own lunch), we New Yorkers have been the face of struggle for the past four years. Ask Alaska's senator Lisa Murkowski, whose daddy is the governor there. She got a full barrel of pork, $223 million for a bridge nobody wants to connect Gravina to the thriving metropolis of Ketchikan, population 8,000. And we beg for funds to upgrade our aging East River bridges, which in one day carry more passengers than this Alaska bridge will likely carry in 50 years.
Indeed, we live in the age of information technology, but a large part of this administration's stated goals have been to follow the Grover Norquist mantra, to "starve the beast". So be it: Mike Brown of FEMA is the poster child of just where back-scratching, incompetence, and résumé inflation get you in this administration: right to the top. A man who hasn't got a qualification to save his life returned home to Washington after being summarily demoted by Homeland Security chief Chertoff, in his own words to "walk my my dog and hug my wife and, maybe get a good Mexican meal and a stiff margarita and a full night's sleep." Of course, the residents of lower Manhattan on 9/11 and countless thousands since Katrina struck would have really enjoyed such a luxury. Veteran news commentator Daniel Schorr, who recently turned 89, reminded us this morning of the other famous former failed president who rode to power by actually successfully preparing for the 1927 Mississippi flood: Herbert Hoover. And like Hoovervilles before him, Bush now enjoys the dubious distinction of having today's 9/11 Bushville camps named after him. Societies are judged by how they treat their poorest, and whether the innocent victims of 9/11 or of Hurricane Katrina, we are failing them all. As I finish writing this, it is precisely 10:48 am, the time of the plane crash in Pennsylvania. Both towers had collapsed by then.


Tags:   None


© All rights reserved.

Posted on 9/11/2005 ( Permanent Link )
 Send to Friend